AutoBeta(AutoBeta.net)08/26 Report--

Mr. Fan of Anji has a BMW, which was suddenly caught on fire some time ago. After that, the two-tier fire department and 4S store respectively investigated and identified the accident, but the results were quite the opposite.

Mr. Fan's BMW was bought at a 4S store in Yongkang, Zhejiang Province for 360000 yuan in 2018. One day in April this year, the BMW 4-Series suddenly caught fire. Mr. Fan said his wife was driving the car at the time, and as soon as the car started to change gears, smoke came out of the gear, while denying the claim that there were flammable and explosive objects in the car that caused the fire.

Because the car was on fire, Mr. Fan didn't have time to take measures until the whole car was burned down. Afterwards, Mr. Fan suspected that there were quality problems in the car itself, which led to a fire, because the accident identification certificates issued by fire departments at Anji and Huzhou levels were all "excluding fires caused by external fire sources, lightning strikes, smoking, etc." do not rule out electrical circuit failures or short circuits to cause fires. "

Mr. Fan found the 4S store with the identification letter, but the 4S store came up with another test report and gave another explanation.

The 4S store said that it commissioned the Beijing China Motor vehicle Judicial Center to identify the burning vehicle, which has the qualification to carry out judicial identification work. According to the appraisal report issued by the agency, it shows that "does not conform to the characteristics of fire caused by electrical circuit failure. Does not rule out the existence of residual fire in the cabin of the identified vehicle, which is triggered to ignite the surrounding combustibles."

In other words, the Beijing China Motor vehicle Judicial Center and the two-level fire department issued a completely opposite result. In this regard, the 4S store said that there are some differences between the two, so it is also a multi-party communication.

One does not rule out the fire caused by the failure of electrical circuits, and the other rules out this possibility. Who should listen to the two conclusions? Automobile Consumer Protection Commission Automotive Professional Rights Protection Committee said that in the case of this responsibility identification is not clear, it is recommended that both parties take the legal approach. In response, Mr. Fan said that next he would solve the problem through legal means.

It is still unknown whether the car is caused by its own quality problems or flammable and explosive materials, but for car owners, they will certainly believe more in the results of the fire brigade, and for the appraisal report made by the agency entrusted by the 4S store, we can not say that it is a certain fake, but it is still more authoritative than the fire department. At present, car owners will solve the problem through judicial channels, and we will continue to pay attention to it.

Welcome to subscribe to the WeChat public account "Automotive Industry Focus" to get the first-hand insider information on the automotive industry and talk about things in the automotive circle. Welcome to break the news! WeChat ID autoWechat