AutoBeta Home News New Vehicle Industry Report Data Report Industrial Economy

In addition to Weibo, there is also WeChat

Please pay attention

WeChat public account

AutoBeta

Multi-car A-pillar bending! Does China Insurance Research become the "5G Wholesale Department" in 2020?

2024-09-08 Update From: AutoBeta autobeta NAV: AutoBeta > News >

Share

AutoBeta(AutoBeta.net)01/27 Report--

C-IASI, as an automobile "demon-reflecting mirror", has attracted much attention due to the "prototype" of many models in crash tests. However, due to the bright shadow model before, let it quiet for half a year, once the comeback will release a number of models in succession. At present, 12 models in the batch of 2020 have obtained collision results, most of which pass with "multi-G", among which many models have A-pillar bending.

The reason why C-IASI was silent for half a year was that a sensitive data was stolen. According to the introduction of China Insurance Research Institute, the incident originated from the poor collision performance of the Haoying model, but got a better rating, then, the temporary link in the review state was stolen, and the temporary link was closed by China Insurance Research Institute, resulting in hot discussion about the Haoying event. However, Zhongbao Research believes that the incident itself is hot and does not want to waste public resources because of this matter, so it did not speak up again afterwards.

image.png

According to the evaluation results of C-IASI 12 models (batch 2020) released by China Insurance Research Institute Test Center (Beijing) Co., Ltd. in two batches recently, it can be seen that there are some popular models that are most concerned at present. The 12 models involve cars and SUVs, extending from tens of thousands of low-end models to hundreds of thousands of high-end models.

Specific models include Great Wall Haval H6, GAC Honda Haoying, Geely Link03, FAW Mazda Art, SAIC Volkswagen Passat, FAW-Volkswagen Audi Q5L, Jianghuai Jiayue A5, FAW Toyota RAV4 Rongfang, Brilliance BMW X3, NIO EC6, Dongfeng Qichen Qichen Star and Ideal ONE.

未标题-1.png

In terms of specific models, SAIC Volkswagen Passat performed best among the 12 collision models, with the highest rating of "7G (Excellent) 1A (Good)". It should be noted that the result of SAIC Volkswagen Passat is the second test in China Insurance Research Institute. Before that, SAIC Volkswagen Passat suffered serious collision failure, A-pillar was seriously bent, and the protection of members in the vehicle was not in place, becoming the worst model in the market at the same level.

1611717151262.jpg

1607065251314731.jpg

The model with the worst performance this time is Jianghuai Jiayue A5 of domestic independent brand, which won the score of "3G (excellent) 3A (good) 1M (average) 1P (poor)". From the collision results, the car has obvious A-pillar bending, firewall also appears obvious collapse, and other items score is also low, resulting in the overall rating slightly worse than most models.

51f17bf228.png

As for the performance of other models, they are equally excellent, but there are also very controversial models, such as the ideal ONE. From the performance of the car, except for the M (average) in the crash resistance and maintenance economy index items, the basic G (excellent) passes, but from the pictures after the collision of the vehicle, it really makes people think, the A-pillar is slightly deformed, the door sill of the car body is obviously deformed and cracked, and more importantly, the leg intrusion of the dummy is relatively serious.

6a72e58523.png

317ea60663.png

In addition to the ideal ONE A-pillar bending to obtain G (excellent) rating, such as Honda Haoying, Link03 is also the same. Mazda Atz also showed an A curve and received an A (good) rating, so that Zhongbao Research was once again questioned whether it was overvalued.

For A-pillar bending still obtained excellent rating, Zhongbao Research previously explained, It said that the official index specified assessment point is the upper corner point of the A-pillar door position in the upper part of the passenger compartment, There are 4 assessment points, The rules are marked in detail, In the A-pillar and roof junction position we have not set assessment indicators. In the video, although the model has a large deformation, it is not possible to judge all the defects of the A-pillar, nor can it judge whether the car is good or bad through the deformation of the roof part in front of the A-pillar and the A-pillar connection. This is not very scientific. The accurate way should be to judge the vehicle according to the specified examination points at the lower end and upper end of the passenger compartment in the front collision of the vehicle, not only by naked eyes.

As we all know, before the emergence of China Insurance Research Institute, the only collision institution in China was C-NCAP China Automobile Research Institute, but most of the collision vehicles carried out in this institution were given five-star rating, which made many netizens constantly tease it as "five-star wholesale department" on the Internet. Although we don't know whether the China Insurance Research Institute has been recharged, on the whole, compared with the 2019 evaluation, the evaluated models have greatly improved both in terms of vehicle economy and vehicle safety.

u=1118428238,2134085440&fm=26&gp=0.jpg

According to the results released by China Insurance Research Institute:

I. Detonation rate of low speed airbag

In the low-speed collision of 15km/h, the airbag mis-initiation rate of 27 models tested in 2019 reached 26%,and the airbag mis-initiation rate of 14 models tested in batch 2020 was 7%, which quickly narrowed the gap with the airbag mis-initiation rate of 5% in the low-speed collision market measured by similar foreign research institutions.

II. Vehicle safety configuration

In terms of vehicle safety configuration, the configuration rate of side air curtain increased from 59% in 2019 batch to 79%, and the standard rate of vehicle emergency brake assist system (AEB) increased from 26% in 2019 to 43% in 2020 batch.

III. Test results

This year, the proportion of test models with poor (P) evaluation decreased significantly, and the proportion of in-vehicle occupant safety index, out-of-vehicle occupant safety index and vehicle auxiliary safety index with good or above increased.

Therefore, judging from the results, it is possible that as C-NCAP continuously improves the collision criteria, the collision performance of vehicles begins to fluctuate. Or it is the continuous improvement made by car companies in order to "test", which makes the results better and better, such as SAIC Volkswagen's Passat, but in any case, this is undoubtedly a good thing for consumption. After all, as a collision mechanism becomes the mainstream of the market, automobile enterprises will consciously move closer to this standard when designing or participating in collisions, thus forcing automobile enterprises to improve safety in order to realize consumers 'pursuit of safety.

Welcome to subscribe to the WeChat public account "Automotive Industry Focus" to get the first-hand insider information on the automotive industry and talk about things in the automotive circle. Welcome to break the news! WeChat ID autoWechat

Views: 0

*The comments in the above article only represent the author's personal views and do not represent the views and positions of this website. If you have more insights, please feel free to contribute and share.

Share To

Network commentsNetwork comments are only for expressing personal opinions and do not express the position of this website

Related

News

Wechat

© 2024 AutoBeta.Net Tiger Media Company. All rights reserved.

12
Report