AutoBeta(AutoBeta.net)09/29 Report--

In response to the earlier incident of Xiaopeng P7 colliding with a rear-end trailer on the highway, Xiaopeng responded to the media by saying: for the accident, the relevant departments issued a "road traffic accident responsibility confirmation", which the customer approved. At the same time, the customer also agrees with the analysis results of the background driving data. That is, before the collision, the front vehicle identification and vehicle control functions are normal; before the collision, the system triggers the seat belt vibration warning, vehicle early warning, AEB emergency braking and other passive safety functions; the NGP system function is normal. At present, the user has withdrawn his complaint against the authorities.

According to previous reports, a Xiaopeng P7 was driving at high speed when the NGP autopilot assisted driving system was activated. There was a large truck in front of the vehicle, but there was no obvious deceleration, and then it crashed directly into the big truck. The accident caused the owner to have a concussion and ache all over the body. He has been hospitalized. Judging from the photos of the accident, the front of the Xiaopeng P7 has been completely deformed, the parts on the ground have been broken, and all the two airbags in the car have been ejected.

A friend who claimed to be the owner of the accident responded to the accident on Weibo. According to its introduction, before the collision, the Xiaopeng P7 driving on the highway enabled NGP autopilot to assist driving and set the speed to 120km/h. The speed of the large truck hit was estimated to be around 60km/h at that time, and the vehicle did not slow down some time before the collision. When the vehicle was 10 meters before the collision, the vehicle recognized the truck and slowed down, but it was too late. "We think the NGP function of Xiaopeng P7 has a fatal flaw," it said. The owner's brother asked to return the car and no longer touch Xiaopeng! "

At present, although the official has not disclosed the specific cause of the accident, the official response that all functions of the vehicle were normal before the collision, the customer approved the "road traffic accident responsibility certificate" issued by the relevant departments, and also approved the analysis results obtained from the background driving data. In other words, the main reason for this incident lies in the customer, not the quality of the vehicle.

At present, intelligent vehicles at home and abroad have reached a consensus that in the 0-5 level division of autopilot, the 0-3 level driving task is taken over by the driver, and the driver is the ultimate responsible person for driving behavior; level 4-5, that is, under the conditions of advanced self-driving and fully autonomous driving, the driving task is taken over by the system, and the system is the ultimate responsible person. At present, the self-driving level of most domestic car companies is about 2.5L, that is, the driver is the main body, so we need to pay real-time attention to the road conditions and take over the vehicle in time if necessary. However, some car companies seldom emphasize in the publicity process, resulting in misleading users in the process of use, and users are often in the exploratory stage for new technologies, but the lessons gained by danger again and again can not be ignored.

Welcome to subscribe to the WeChat public account "Automotive Industry Focus" to get the first-hand insider information on the automotive industry and talk about things in the automotive circle. Welcome to break the news! WeChat ID autoWechat