AutoBeta(AutoBeta.net)07/22 Report--

According to relevant media reports, I bought a Lincoln car and found glass popping up on the dashboard of the new car after only six days of driving. as soon as it was identified, the front screen had been replaced. After many fruitless negotiations with the 4S store, Mr. Kui took the 4S store to court. A few days ago, the people's Court of Hanjiang District ruled that the 4S store "refunded one to compensate three" and compensated for 1.38 million.

In June 2017, Mr. Yu bought a Lincoln SUV with a total price of 460000 yuan at the 4S store in Yangzhou Tianxu da Lincoln. On the sixth day of picking up the car, he found that there were two glass dashboards on the dashboard of the new car, and then passed other maintenance checks. Mr. Li learned that the car may be a maintenance car, and the front windshield may have been replaced.

In addition, Mr. Yu also found that the A-column on the left side of the vehicle was uneven and the central rearview mirror inside the car was loose. He found so many problems and sent the vehicle to the testing agency for testing. The test report showed that the front windshield of the vehicle conformed to the characteristics that had been replaced, according to which Mr. Li learned that he had bought a maintenance car.

With the car inspection report, Mr. Xiao once again came to the 4S store of Tianxuda Lincoln in Yangzhou, and the reply from the 4S store was that the front windshield replacement had nothing to do with the store, but was replaced by the manufacturer, and they did not know. Manager Li, who is in charge of one of the stores, said that according to the feedback from the manufacturer, the glass of the vehicle had indeed been replaced, but a glass problem was found on the production line, so it was replaced.

But Li, manager of Yangzhou Tianxuda Lincoln 4S store, did not respond positively to why the quality of the front windshield replaced by the manufacturer was so rough.

The lawyer said that according to the relevant regulations, if one party deliberately tells the other party the false situation, or deliberately conceals the true situation and induces the other party to make a wrong expression of intention, it can be recognized as a fraud. Consumers may demand a refund of one to three in accordance with the provisions of Article 55.

At present, in the civil judgment of the people's Court of Hanjiang District, Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, the court revoked the original sales contract and demanded that the Yangzhou Tianxu da Lincoln 4S store return 460000 yuan for the purchase and triple the compensation for the purchase of 1.38 million yuan. this also means that Mr. Han has achieved preliminary results in safeguarding his rights for two years. However, Yangzhou Tianxu da Lincoln 4S store does not recognize the result of the first instance, and the above-mentioned second trial may be carried out.

According to the focus of the judgment of first instance, the court held that the new cars imported by consumers should be imported original, brand-new, unmodified and unrepaired vehicles according to the cognitive ability and psychology of consumers. If the car parts are replaced, it will obviously affect consumers' purchase choices. The 4S store did not inform Mr. Yu of the fact that the windshield had been replaced.

However, Mr. Kui said that they believe in the impartiality of justice and that facts always belong to facts, and they will accept them calmly regardless of the final outcome of the second trial.

Welcome to subscribe to the WeChat public account "Automotive Industry Focus" to get the first-hand insider information on the automotive industry and talk about things in the automotive circle. Welcome to break the news! WeChat ID autoWechat