AutoBeta(AutoBeta.net)07/28 Report--

Recently, Mr. Qi bought a cheetah. Two months later, he found that the car was in stock, and he suspected that the engine was not from the original factory. He felt that he had been cheated and asked the seller to compensate. What happened?

In January this year, Mr. Qi went to a local car store to see the car, and the salesman recommended him a cheetah SUV. But after picking up the car for more than two months, one of Mr. Qi's friends checked the nameplate of the car and found that it was in stock and had been in stock for more than a year.

Mr. Qi then carefully examined the nameplate and information of the car and confirmed that the car was actually produced in December 2017 and had been in stock for more than a year by the time he bought it.

In addition, because the car is stored in the open air and the wind is blowing in the sun, Mr. Qi is worried that it will have an adverse impact on the parts of the car. After examining the engine, it was also unexpectedly found that the car's engine may not be the original factory, which does not match the description of the engine in the sales store.

Mr. Qi said that at that time, the salesperson said that the engine of the car was owned by Mitsubishi heavy Industries, including the one in the sales store. But after we got the car, we found that the engine was not owned by Mitsubishi. The explanation of the store was that the Mitsubishi engine had been localized and we made it ourselves.

Mr. Qi questioned that the other party concealed the truth and sold the inventory car to him without knowing it. In response, Mr. Qi contacted the seller for an explanation, but did not get an answer.

The media followed Mr. Qi to find the person in charge of the sales store. Manager Chen said that the store could only see the date and date of the car arriving in the warehouse, but the sales store could not check the production date of the car. There is a process of picking up the car, and Mr. Qi needs to check the relevant information of the vehicle himself. As for whether the car's engine is original, both sides have their own opinions.

Manager Chen said that there are three engines in the store, and Mr. Qi's CF15 engine is made by Mitsubishi Technology.

But Mr Qi denies the claim. Mr. Qi said that in the process of buying the car, the seller did not give an obvious reminder and notification of the car inspection, so he thought that the store had deliberately cheated.

In addition, Mr. Qi asked the store to return 5000 yuan in compensation, which included 5000 yuan in vehicle decoration fee in the 110000 car price. Now he did not want it, and asked the store to return it as compensation. In this regard, Manager Chen said he would study a solution.

So, according to the current understanding, does this behavior of the store constitute a fraud? In this regard, the media questioned the relevant lawyers.

The lawyer said that if the seller of the car deliberately concealed or provided a false production date or concealed the defects of the car at the time of sale, it could constitute fraud. However, in real life, more car buyers do not check the relevant information of the vehicle when they pick up the car, so the behavior of the seller can not constitute fraud.

However, no matter whether the seller constitutes a fraud or not, as long as the car in stock is sold, the buyer can require the seller to bear the liability for breach of contract, including replacement, repair or compensation for loss.

I would also like to remind you that in the process of buying a car, we must check the relevant information of the vehicle in the process of vehicle acceptance, so as to avoid unnecessary trouble.

Welcome to subscribe to the WeChat public account "Automotive Industry Focus" to get the first-hand insider information on the automotive industry and talk about things in the automotive circle. Welcome to break the news! WeChat ID autoWechat