AutoBeta(AutoBeta.net)09/27 Report--

On September 27th, C-IASI Baoyan released new crash results, this time the Changan Ford focus, the last of the first batch of test models in 2019.

According to the original evaluation notice issued by the PICC Research Institute, the model that should be tested for the configuration of low-speed collision, passenger safety and pedestrian safety is the 2019 hatchback 1.5L sharp model, and the 2019 hatchback EcoBoost 180 automatic flare model for testing safety assistance. However, the final Changan Ford focus test results were inconsistent with the initial test notice models, which were changed to 2019 hatchback 1.5L automatic frontal models and 2020 hatchback 1.5L automatic frontal models to participate in low-speed collision, occupant safety and pedestrian safety tests, and 2020 hatchback EcoBoost 180 automatic frontal models to participate in the safety auxiliary test, but Baoyan did not respond to what happened during the period.

In the low speed collision and economic maintenance index, the final evaluation was A good. In the positive test, the vehicle airbag did not detonate, the front speed was 15 km / h, the front stringer had no maintenance marks, and the excellent structure of the car body scored 6 points and scored 5 points. Because of the ratio of maintenance cost to car price, the economic index of front maintenance scored 24 points and 12 points. The rear score is better than the front, the crashworthiness gets full score, the maintenance economy scores 19 points, including the weighted 19.67 points, the final overall evaluation is A good.

C-IASI 's economic maintenance index is from the point of view of insurance, through more stringent collision tests, reflecting the safety of vehicles and the direct cost of post-collision repair to insurance companies. This means that the lower the maintenance cost after the collision, the higher the evaluation score.

In the front 25% offset collision test, the A column of Fox bent at 64 km / h, and the structure was not strong enough, but according to the crew cabin data, the upper bending was rated as A good. Although the low configuration is equipped with a safety air curtain, points were deducted due to the lack of seat belt restraint, and the final evaluation was A good.

In the side collision test, the 1.5-ton mobile trolley crashed into the Fox at a speed of 50 kilometers per hour, and the overall evaluation of the side collision was G excellent. However, the door was opened during the collision, the protective performance of the front side airbag was weakened, and the score of the front false human body cadre was obvious, which led to the final downgrade to A good.

And in the seat, headrest and roof hardness all got G excellent results.

Although Fox finally got three excellent and one good result, the manufacturers should pay attention to the hidden dangers such as the lack of A-pillar hardness, the lack of seat belt bondage and the opening of the side door.

Welcome to subscribe to the WeChat public account "Automotive Industry Focus" to get the first-hand insider information on the automotive industry and talk about things in the automotive circle. Welcome to break the news! WeChat ID autoWechat