NAV: AutoBeta Home > AutoBeta Popular content >

NIO was sued by Davis property Learn more about NIO was sued by Davis property

AutoBeta has retrieved the following content about NIO was sued by Davis property for you across the entire web.

• 

  Weilai ran into trouble again and was sued by Davis property and was sentenced to compensation of 1.1 million yuan.

  Recently, according to the ruling of Shanghai Jiading District Court, Shanghai Ulai Automobile Co., Ltd. should pay 1.1 million yuan in intermediary service fee to Savills property, as well as late payment interest.

  Weilai was sued by Davis property Lulai Motor. 2020-03-12
• 

  Was sued by Audi for changing the name of ES7 European market to EL7?

  "Global business" is the major direction of the development of new forces and new energy car companies in China in recent years. As one of the new forces in domestic car building, Lulai announced its entry into the Norwegian market in May 2021. In September of the same year, ES8 was officially listed in Norway and started user delivery. In December, in Weilai NI

  Models Europe Audi cars markets Germany lawsuits trademarks products representatives systems global company power reasons 2022-10-07
• 

  Sued by Audi! Wei Lai changed his name.

  According to the plan, "NIO Berlin" will be held in Berlin, Germany at 0: 00 Beijing time on October 8, and three models of ET7, ET5 and ES7 will be released to the European market. It is worth mentioning that Weilai quietly renamed the ES7 model to "EL7", and the market speculated

  Audi market model car product trademark global or Germany Europe development litigation traditional new energy surface 2022-10-07
• 

  NIO Pilot autopilot system upgrade with 7 new functions

  The NIO Pilot autopilot system will be upgraded, Weilai said in an official statement. Seven new features have been added to the new system, and the NIO OS 2.0 intelligent operating system has been launched at the same time. The upgrade of NIO Pilot autopilot system adds seven functions, including high-speed autopilot (Highway Pilot), congested autopilot (Traffic Jam Pilot), turn signal control lane change (Auto Lane Change) and so on. After this upgrade, it officially marks that the NIO Pilot system has become.

  Driving Weilai add 2019-06-11
• 

  Honda sues Great Wall "Harvard H6" for plagiarism claim of 20 million, Great Wall denies the accusation

  In October 2017, Honda formally sued Great Wall for patent infringement, involving a Harvard H6, the second time Honda has sued a Chinese-owned car brand for infringement. On June 20, the above-mentioned case was formally heard in the Beijing intellectual property Court. According to the plaintiff Honda Technical Research Industry Co., Ltd., in 2007, the company obtained two patents for inventions entitled "the rear door structure of the vehicle" (No. 200710008273.0) and "the decoration installation structure of the vehicle" (No. 200710161631.1). Honda was in the Great Wall Motor Company in 2015.

  Great Wall Honda sue Harvard 2019-06-21
• 

  Geely voluntarily withdrew the lawsuit after paying 790000 of the legal costs.

  Geely Motor sued Weima Motor for infringing trade secrets, which aroused social concern because of claims as high as 2.1 billion yuan, which is currently the largest commercial dispute in intellectual property litigation in China. According to a civil ruling issued by the Sichuan Provincial higher people's Court recently, Chengdu Plateau Automotive Industry Co., Ltd., owned by Geely Motor, as the plaintiff, has voluntarily withdrawn the lawsuit against Weima Automobile and paid 695900 yuan to accept the case. According to the civil ruling, the plaintiff Chengdu Plateau Automotive Industry Co., Ltd. and the defendant Weima Zhongde Automotive Technology Chengdu Co., Ltd.

  Geely Weimar 2020-02-13
• 

  Heavy! Geely sued Weimar Motor, a company that created cars, and claimed as much as 2.1 billion yuan.

  A major case will be staged in the auto circle in September. Zhejiang Geely holding Group and Geely Automobile Research Institute sued four companies of Weima Automobile, a new force in car manufacturing, on the grounds of infringing trade secrets. including Weima Automobile Technology Group, Weima Wisdom Travel Technology, Weima Automobile Manufacturing Wenzhou Company, Weima New Energy Automobile sales Company, and the claim amount in this dispute is as high as 2.1 billion yuan. The case was opened in the case of judicial protection of intellectual property rights announced by the Supreme people's Court. Zhejiang Geely holding Group Co., Ltd. v. Weima Automotive Technology Group Co., Ltd. and other disputes over infringement of trade secrets have been submitted in 2018, the subject of the lawsuit.

  Geely suing building cars companies heavyweights 2019-08-30
• 

  The owner of the car for protection of rights was claimed by Tesla for 5 million yuan and frozen property.

  Recently, Tesla was ordered to return one to three for sales fraud, and Tesla had to refund the car owner a total of more than 1.51 million yuan. However, the incident was not over yet. Tesla claimed 5.05 million yuan from the owner of the car for infringing on the right of reputation. Yesterday, Tesla owner @ ID_ Han Chao released a long article saying that he was sued by Tesla for infringing on the right of reputation. As can be seen from the indictment issued by the car owner Han Chao, Tesla believes that the defendant, the owner surnamed Han, attributed all the accidents related to Tesla to Tesla's product quality problems without confirming the relevant facts. and long-term unverified and unfounded remarks through social platform accounts, and.

  Tesla 2021-09-27
• 

  Weilai was sued by a US law firm for publishing misleading information.

  The company reported a net loss of 9.639 billion yuan on a total revenue of 4.9512 billion yuan in 2018, which widened on March 6. In terms of sales volume, Xilai delivered a total of 11348 ES8 vehicles throughout the year. At the same time, Xilai announced that it had cancelled the plan to build its own factory in Jiading, Shanghai, signed in 2017, and that the products would continue to be manufactured by Jianghuai Automobile. After Weilai released its 2018 results, its share price plummeted, falling by more than 20% at one point. However, the house missed a lot of rain, and Ulai was also met by law firms in the United States.

  Weilai 2019-03-15
• 

  Tesla's internal email warns employees of the serious act of leaking secrets and may be fired or face charges.

  Earlier, a lot of internal information about Tesla was revealed by internal employees, including Tesla's quantity of scrapped materials in the production process, the company's confidential information, and so on, which indirectly brought pressure of public opinion on Tesla's side. Musk was certainly not happy. A few days ago, Tesla sent an internal letter to employees of the company, warning them that if they disclose information related to the company to the media, or steal confidential information to other competitive companies, they may be fired, or face charges, lawsuits, etc. The email was signed by the Tesla security team and listed some employees' misconduct. According to the email, a former employee got it from Tesla.

  Tesla 2019-05-05
• 

  Zhongtai Motor was sued by the supplier again because of the debt of 600 million.

  With the official statement, Zhongtai Automobile and other four auto companies "bankruptcy door" incident has been temporarily quelled, Zhongtai said the content of the online news is completely false. However, a lawsuit from the supplier plunged Zhongtai, a 20-year-old independent car company, into a "debt door", and the problem of capital chain was still simmering. Shenzhen Bic Power Battery Co., Ltd. sued Zhongtai Motors for 600 million yuan. On October 14, Bick Battery issued a notice to disclose the details of the case. The company's lawsuit against Zhongtai four companies was filed in Hangzhou Intermediate people's Court on August 5. The case was withdrawn after the two sides reached a settlement agreement, but Zhongtai failed to comply with the agreement and has now filed another lawsuit.

  Zhongtai lost money and Zhongtai was sued. 2019-10-16
• 

  Heavyweight | Beijing Court ruled that Land Rover Aurora won, and production of the fake Land Wind X7 must be stopped.

  After three years of litigation, Jaguar Land Rover's lawsuit against Jiangling Land Rover finally came to a conclusion. Jiangling Land Rover lost the lawsuit, and Jaguar Land Rover won. Beijing Chaoyang District Court recently ruled that five designs of Lufeng X7 made by China Jiangling Motor directly copied the design of range Rover Aurora, causing confusion among consumers and ordered Jiangling to stop production immediately, Reuters reported. According to the court's ruling, the production, sales and marketing promotion of Lufeng X7 should be stopped immediately. More importantly, Jiangling must also pay compensation to Jaguar Land Rover, the exact amount of which has not been reported. The court is comparing the two cars.

  Cars Establishment Beijing Jaguar Land Rover models sales Litigation Design Investment response content Land Wind success finally first 2019-03-23
• 

  Heavy! Jiangling refused to accept the judgment and appealed to the court, refusing to admit that Lu Feng X7 copied Land Rover.

  In March this year, Jaguar Land Rover eagerly announced a major news that the infringement case of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jiangling Company) was sued by the Chaoyang District people's Court in Beijing, China, and finally won after three years of litigation. The court ordered Jiangling to immediately stop the "unfair competition behavior" involved in the case, immediately stop production and sale of two specific Land Wind X7 models, issued a statement on the official website and media, and paid 1.5 million yuan in compensation to Jaguar Land Rover. We looked through the official website of Jiangling Company and Lufeng Motor and found no relevant statement about the lawsuit. On the contrary, Jiangling Motor Co., Ltd.

  2019-04-23
• 

  The 2.1 billion sky-high price claim case goes to trial today! The first intellectual property case of a Chinese car company

  The commercial dispute, by far the largest amount of litigation in the domestic intellectual property industry, will be heard in the second Court of the Shanghai High Court today. Geely, the plaintiff, is a representative of domestic auto brands, and the defendant Weima Motors is one of the representatives of the new car-building forces established in 2015. Geely's "lawsuit" against Weima is a dispute between a traditional mainframe factory and a new car company, the first intellectual property infringement case initiated by a Chinese independent car company, and a lawsuit involving the highest amount of claims in intellectual property disputes in China's automobile industry. the subject matter of the case reached 2.1 billion yuan. As the case is a private trial, the complaint has not been made public, it is understood that Ji.

  Automobile enterprise 2019-09-18
• 

  Weilai online "only rent but not sell", Li Bin: vehicles will eventually become services

  On the evening of October 7, local time, NIO Berlin 2022 was held in Berlin, officially opening services in Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden. It should be noted that different from the previous domestic car sales model, Lailai only launched "subscription" in the four European countries.

  Subscriptions models Europe markets users Audi models services litigation cars four countries different countries Germany systems 2022-10-08
• 

  There was a big disaster in the autopilot, and the family of Tesla's car accident in California sued Tesla.

  In March 2018, Chinese engineer Walter Huang drove his 2017 Tesla modelX in an accident on the highway, collided with the separation belt of the highway, and was rear-ended by Audi in the rear. Tesla finally caught fire and Walter Huang died. Now Huang's family sued Tesla in a California court on April 28th. In the indictment, the lawyer described as follows: "the defendant was negligent and careless in the design, manufacture, testing, marketing, sales and maintenance of Tesla Model X in 2017, and the defendant did not provide sufficient instructions and warnings.

  Tesla prosecution family member USA 2019-05-03
• 

  The light of the galaxy is suspected of plagiarism? Chang'an sent a letter to Geely's lawyer, Geely issued a statement: the content is seriously untrue

  On February 28, a screenshot of a lawyer's letter suing Zhejiang Geely Automobile Co., Ltd. and Geely Automobile Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Geely") on suspicion of infringing the intellectual property rights of Changan Automobile went viral on the Internet. According to the lawyer's letter, on February 23, 2023, Geely held a meeting at the main venue of the Hangzhou Asian Games.

  Geely Automobile Galaxy Changan Changan Light prototype New car Model lawyer property right New Press Conference Brand knowledge 2023-02-28
• 

  Trademark infringement! Tesla sued a company for a compensation of 5 million yuan

  Recently, the verdict of Tesla v. "Tesla Beer" trademark infringement was announced, and the verdict was "reject the appeal and uphold the original verdict". In other words, Tesla won this case. According to reports, the court determined that the Tesla series of trademarks were well-known trademarks and sentenced the defendant Zhongyin Food Co., Ltd. ("Tesla Beer").

  Tex Tesla trademark beer judgment company court appeal infringement miscarriage original judgment brand limited limited consumer 2023-08-10
• 

  Zhongtai car sales halved, and net profit in the third quarter fell sharply by 524.50% compared with the same period last year.

  On October 28, Zhongtai officially released its third-quarter results, which showed that its operating income in the third quarter of this year was 3.609 billion yuan, down 88.41% from the same period last year, and the net profit of shareholders belonging to listed companies was 470 million yuan, down 524.50% from the same period last year. The company's operating income in the first three quarters was 5.401 billion yuan, down 59.59% from the same period last year, and the net profit attributed to shareholders of listed companies was 759 million yuan, down 283.02% from the same period last year. Recently, Junma, a subsidiary of Zhongtai Motor, encountered more than a hundred dealers to protect its rights, due to the supply of gearbox and spare parts.

  Zhongtai Automobile third quarter results 2019-10-28
• 

  Lifan was sued for 1.4 billion yuan, and a number of suppliers were in arrears.

  After the decline in sales, the qualification for land sales and the freezing of shares, Lifan Motor was also sued by auto parts suppliers and financial companies for a huge sum of money, demanding a payment of more than 1 billion yuan. A few days ago, Wanan Science and Technology announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary Zhejiang Zhuji Wanbao Machinery Co., Ltd. had submitted a civil complaint to the people's Court of Zhuji City, Zhejiang Province on July 22, requiring Chongqing Lifan passenger car Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Lifan Co., and Beibei Branch of Lifan Automobile to pay about 6.0757 million yuan. Wanan Science and Technology Bulletin said that since 2007, Lifan passenger car, Lifan passenger car Beibei branch continues to.

  Sue supplier Lifan 2019-07-30