NAV: AutoBeta Home > AutoBeta Popular content >

judgments Learn more about judgments

AutoBeta has retrieved the following content about judgments for you across the entire web.

• 

  The second trial upheld the original verdict! Tesla wins the lawsuit against "5 million fans of Douyin".

  The result of the judgment of the second instance was announced, and the result of the judgment was upheld, and the judgment was final. In other words, this case ended in Tesla's victory. In June 2022, Tesla sued "Boss Cai" for infringement of reputation. On October 31 of the same year, the result of the first instance of the case was announced, and the judgment showed that the court recognized

  Boss Tess Tesla video judgment platform company content friend case court result infringement second instance event 2023-03-14
• 

  Tesla responded to the Big V dispute case: the judgment of first instance apologized to Tesla. The Shanghai Auto Show incident is still under trial.

  Tesla responded to a reputation dispute with Weibo user "Yan Chuang" in a post on Weibo on Aug. 28. Tesla said that recently, we have noticed that Mr. Yan posted on Weibo the relevant contents of the reputation dispute with Tesla, which attracted everyone's attention. In order to let the majority of netizens know the truth, I would like to talk about the relevant situation.

  Tess Tesla Honor Mr. reputation right judgment user dispute Auto Show Brake Law China event Shanghai matter 2023-08-28
• 

  BMW caught fire while driving, and the owner sued for 190000 yuan.

  Recently, the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability disputes of Guangzhou Baoyue Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., BMW (China) Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, rejected the above and upheld the original verdict. this judgment is final. The course of the case: in March 2011, Xiao bought a BMW off-road vehicle in Guangzhou Baoyue for 709000 yuan. in the subsequent use process, the plaintiff used the vehicle according to the vehicle manual and maintained it regularly. In September 2018, the car suddenly smoked and caught fire while driving on the road, and was finally burned into an empty shell. In October 2018,.

  BMW 2021-08-22
• 

  Heavy! Jiangling refused to accept the judgment and appealed to the court, refusing to admit that Lu Feng X7 copied Land Rover.

  In March this year, Jaguar Land Rover eagerly announced a major news that the infringement case of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jiangling Company) was sued by the Chaoyang District people's Court in Beijing, China, and finally won after three years of litigation. The court ordered Jiangling to immediately stop the "unfair competition behavior" involved in the case, immediately stop production and sale of two specific Land Wind X7 models, issued a statement on the official website and media, and paid 1.5 million yuan in compensation to Jaguar Land Rover. We looked through the official website of Jiangling Company and Lufeng Motor and found no relevant statement about the lawsuit. On the contrary, Jiangling Motor Co., Ltd.

  2019-04-23
• 

  Tesla sued goods to play the final victory! Product play: will be submitted for retrial

  On June 13th, Pinplay issued a statement on its official Weibo on the verdict of the second instance in Tesla's case. The Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate people's Court has made a final judgment on the infringement of reputation by Beijing Pinci Interactive Technology Co., Ltd., the operator of Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., the statement said.

  Tesi Tesla judgment company court article limited limited Shanghai reputation official platform people's court people reputation right 2023-06-13
• 

  Lost! Court final judgment: Tesla sales fraud "return one for one compensation"

  Tesla was sued by the car owner for "suspected sales fraud". The court finally ruled that Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd. lost the case and needed to return the car at the original price and compensate the owner for the purchase of 778200 yuan. According to the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability dispute of Li Zhilong and Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, the party Li Zhilong (hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Li") spent 778200 yuan to buy Tesla Model X, and later found that the car had inconsistent model certificates of drive motors, so Mr. Li sold Tesla cars (Wenzhou).

  Tesla 2021-06-22
• 

  The mileage of buying a second-hand BMW was changed and the court decided that the car company did not constitute fraud.

  At the end of 2018, Mr. Li, who lives in Changsha, Hunan Province, bought a used BMW from a second-hand dealer in Xianglong Chesheng, Changsha County. Soon after, Mr. Li found that the mileage of the car had been adjusted by nearly 10,000 kilometers. Mr. Li sued the used car dealer to the local court, which finally ruled that the car dealer did not constitute fraud. Mr. Li felt very confused. Let's take a look at what happened: on November 26, 2018, Mr. Li spent 180000 yuan on a BMW X5 used car shipped in 2008 at the Xianglong Cesheng used car dealer in Changsha County, Hunan Province.

  BMW car dealership court 2019-05-17
• 

  7500 yuan for 200000 Mercedes-Benz sellers do not deliver goods! Final judgment: compensation of 196000 yuan

  Some time ago, a shopping dispute over a used car auction triggered a heated discussion among netizens. A user reported that he killed a second-hand Mercedes-Benz car with the original price of 204000 yuan at a price of 7500 yuan on Taobao auction. However, the seller then contacted him and said that the price was mismarked and hoped that he could get a refund. The user refused a refund and urged delivery several times. Subsequently, the two sides went to court on the matter. Recently, the incident has finally come to an end. According to the court documents, the Chengdu Intermediate people's Court of Sichuan Province issued a final judgment on the case, and the company was awarded 196500 yuan in compensation to Mr. Liu. Related matters.

  Mercedes Benz 2021-11-16
• 

  Tesla won the final case of "chip reduction", and the car owner's request for "core change" was rejected.

  On March 2, 2020, a car owner Tesla posted on Weibo that the configuration of the upgraded after-drive version of the domestic standard Model 3 had been downgraded and that the car was equipped with a vehicle controller code-named 1462554 (FSD chip HW3.0), but when the owner removed the vehicle controller, he found it was code-named 1465773 (FSD chip HW2.5). Compared with the HW2.5 chip, the computing power of the HW3.0 chip is 21 times higher than that of the HW2.5 chip.

  Tesla 2021-08-06
• 

  A public apology and a compensation of 5 million! Dongfeng Co., Ltd. won the lawsuit against Beijing car thousands of miles away.

  On August 25, the official account "NI+ Planet" on Dongfeng Nissan announced that Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd. won over Beijing Auto Qianli Interactive Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "che Qianli"). Dongfeng Nissan in "Justice will not be absent!" Dongfeng Co., Ltd. v. Beijing che Qianli Internet infringement case won the second instance, "the article said:"

  Dongfeng Company Limited Qianli Co. Ltd. Automobile Dongfeng Automobile judgment Video Qijun second instance Laboratory Bull cart account experiment 2023-08-25
• 

  The latest result of the one-for-three refund case: Tesla's application for retrial was rejected

  Today, Mr. Han, a party to Tesla's "withdrawal of one indemnity for three" case, said in a personal Weibo post: the Beijing Municipal higher people's Court has ruled in accordance with the law to reject Tesla's application for retrial, and the case has been finally concluded for more than three years. Reviewing the related events, the car owner, Mr. Han, spent 379700 yuan on Tesla Guan.com in 2019.

  Tex Tesla vehicle company Hanxian car owner first instance accident court judgment reputation right of reputation case Beijing structure 2023-03-28
• 

  A preliminary judgment on the cause of spontaneous combustion of GAC Aion S new energy, which is related to this thing.

  Gu Huinan, general manager of GAC NE, said in an interview with Sina that the preliminary judgment of the incident may be related to the 'disinfectant' in the trunk, and the specific reasons are still under further investigation.

  GAC NE responded to the fire new energy spontaneous combustion 2020-05-19
• 

  Compensation of 300000 yuan! Weilai succeeds in suing Douyin Big V

  On Nov. 14, the legal Department of Weilai said in a post on its official Weibo that the final verdict of the case of "vehicle discipline" infringing on the reputation right of Weilai came out and the case was won. Officials said: upon receipt of the court's final judgment, the court found that the video content involved in the infringer's Shanghai ladder case was untrue, misleading people who were not clear about the price information of electric vehicles.

  Video account judgment Price Justice Ministry of Justice misleading Price content aspect Court Battery Norway Public official 2023-11-15
• 

  Wenzhou Tesla car owner responded to the verdict: admit that the mistake was to settle the insurance claim.

  According to the latest judgment of the people's Court of Lucheng District, Wenzhou City, due to improper operation of the Wenzhou Tesla car owner, several parked vehicles and sidewalk guardrail and other facilities were collided after the vehicle accelerated out of control, requiring the car owner to apologize to Tesla and compensate Tesla for 50, 000 yuan on the top of his account on Douyin platform for 90 days. In response to the judgment, Mr. Chen said in response to the "urgent call" that he had no choice but to admit it in order to divide the liability and complete the insurance claim as soon as possible. Mr. Chen said, "I am a victim. Tesla did not compensate me for a penny. Instead, he has been sued by Tesla. He has not yet got the verdict and will appeal when he gets it." In.。

  Tesla 2021-10-12
• 

  Ningbo many BYD E5 collective burning, BYD: preliminary judgment of arson

  An explanation of the burning event of Ningbo E5

  The incident that Ningbo E5 was burned explained that ​​​​ 2020-08-17
• 

  Tesla was ordered to pay 100000 yuan in compensation for selling the accident car.

  Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd. was awarded 100000 yuan in compensation, according to the Beijing Court trial Information Network today. According to the verdict, the case is a dispute over a sale contract. The defendant is Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd., and the plaintiffs are Luo Xianghao and Zhou Yan. The specific events are

  Tex Tesla vehicle company accident sales maintenance car owner Zhou Yan major case structure judgment used car court 2022-06-21
• 

  Xiaopeng P7 suddenly caught fire, 4S store responded: preliminary judgment collision fire

  On September 16, it was revealed that a Xiaopeng car in Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province was suspected to have a spontaneous combustion accident. According to the new depot report, the burning vehicle is Xiaopeng P7. From the exposed video, the location of the fire is located in the rear chassis of the car, the scene fire is rapid, the whole right rear wheel is surrounded by fire, accompanied by a slight explosion, suspected wheels.

  Vehicle Xiaopeng car accident personnel collision location cause sales Media chassis Fire Battery Shanghai Changzhou 2022-09-17
• 

  The fire department has made a preliminary judgment on the car owner's response to the ideal ONE "spontaneous combustion" incident.

  A few days ago, an ideal ONE became the object of public opinion because of its sudden "spontaneous combustion" by social media, but soon the ideal car officials responded accordingly. However, as the "spontaneous combustion" incident of new energy vehicles is a major concern in the industry at present, the owners involved have also explained it after being diagnosed by the fire department.

  Ideal ONE 2020-05-12
• 

  Land Rover accuses Jiangling of turning defeat into victory! Lu Feng X7 plagiarized range Rover Aurora Patent was ruled invalid

  On December 16, 2019, the Supreme people's Court of the people's Republic of China rejected the second-instance retrial application of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd., upholding the second-instance judgment of the Beijing Supreme people's Court, according to the China referee Writing website. Lu Feng X7 was found to have copied the aurora design of Land Rover. Range Rover Aurora made its debut at the 2010 Guangzhou Motor Show, while Jiangling Holdings' Lufeng X7 made its debut at the 2014 Guangzhou Motor Show. The biggest highlight of the Land Wind X7 is its appearance, because the Land Wind X7 is highly similar to the Land Rover Aurora, and the price is much cheaper than the Land Rover Aurora.

  Land wind X7 2020-01-09
• 

  Buy Shijie equipped with "shanzhai" stereo, the second trial upheld the original verdict: refund one indemnity three indemnity 1.859 million

  The country's first audio fraud constitutes a second-instance judgment in a vehicle fraud case, and the court upheld the original verdict: the company returned 619800 yuan to Chen Bo for car purchase and paid 1.8594 million yuan in compensation. In March 2015, Mr. Chen of Chongqing spent 619800 yuan on a Porsche Macan from Chongqing Haoda Automobile sales Co., Ltd. in June 2017, the owner of the car, Mr. Chen, was ready to sell the car and drive to the used car market for inspection. When he found that the vehicle's "BOSE original stereo" label automatically fell off, after professional appraisal, Mr. Chen learned that the so-called BOSE stereo was a fake. It.

  Porsche 2019-04-25